Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
CE653 – Asynchronous Circuit Design
  • Instructor: C. Sotiriou


2
Contents
  • Event-driven Gates: C and XOR
  • The C Element and potential implementations
    • C element formal models
  • The Micropipeline event structure
  • Micropipeline analysis using PTnets and FSMs
  • Bundled-data concept
  • Four-Phase Micropipeline structure
  • Two-phase signalling
  • Two-phase Micropipeline with simple or delayed CP signals
  • Other Controller types:
    • Semi and Fully-decoupled Latch Controller
  • Delay Line Design







3
The C Element
  • AND gate for events








  • What is the OR gate equivalent for events?
4
C-Element Implementations
5
C-Element Implementations
  • Using Standard Cells
    • 2-input C-Element’s Logic Function is:
      c = ab + c(a + b) = ab + bc + ac
    • n-input C-Element is:
      c = a1a2…an + c(a1 + a2 + … + an)
  • Thus may be implemented using two level logic or using an SR latch
6
C Gate Formal Models
7
Micropipeline Control Structure
  • Req/Ack are handshaking pairs
  • C[i] accepts 1/0 from C[i-1] only if C[i+1]=0/1
  • Think of 1010101.. as waves: 10 10 10 1..
  • The C-elements propagate waves precisely
  • Timing depends on local delays, may vary along the pipe
  • If RIGHT is quiet, pipe will fill and stall
  • Same for 4-phase, 2-phase
8
Micropipeline Analysis - PTnets
  • Two-stage Micropipeline PTnet:
9
Micropipeline Analysis - PTnets
  • Four-stage Micropipeline PTnet:










  • Represents 4 C Elements and their environments
  • Correct operation may be verified by possible signal orders
10
Micropipeline Analysis - PTnets
  • Four-stage Micropipeline Ptnet
    • Reduction to Latch Control Signals






  • Characteristic Pattern:
11
Micropipeline Analysis - MSFSMs
  • Two-stage Micropipeline FSMs:









  • What  about LHS/RHS FSM Interfaces?
    • What are the two environment FSMs Rin/Ain, Rout/Aout?

12
Bundled-Data Concept
  • Static combinational logic (typically) and standard FFs or latches
  • Channels use bundled-data protocol
  • Delay line matches worst-case delay of combinational logic
    • Margin limits performance, particularly because adds to forward latency
  • Controller CTRL drives local clock to bank of FFs (or latches)
    • Designed using known templates or burst-mode controllers, signal-transition graphs, or syntax directed translation

13
Four-Phase Micropipeline
  • Latches are active high
  • Four-phase, so latches open on first ½ of h/s and close on second ½


14

Four-Phase Micropipeline Stage
  • Four-phase protocol on Lreq/Lack and Rreq/Rack
    • Latch is simple level sensitive traditional latch
    • This is a half-buffer!
15
Four-Phase Micropipeline with C.L.
  • Delay elements mimic worst-case critical path of Combinational Logic F of each pipe stage
16
Micropipeline 4-Phase PTnet including Latch Enable
  • L
    • Active-low in PTnet
  • L-
    • Opens
  • L+
    • Closes

  • Normally opposite
17
Two Phase Signaling
18
Capture-Pass Data Latch
19
Two-Phase Micropipeline
  • Simple version without Cd (C done), Pd (P done)
    • Little difference anyway in generating fake done signals (using delay elements)
20
Two-phase Micropipeline Stage – with CP Latches
  • Store data upon Lreq event when last Pass event is done
    • Ensure new store data only when old data is no longer needed
    • Identified by right hand side changing Rack indicating does not need data
      • Transition of Rack causes CP latch to go transparent
  • Note two-phase protocol on Lreq/Lack and Rack/Req
    • Full-buffer handshaking!

21
Two-phase Micropipeline Stage – with Transparent Latches
  • Transparent Latches
    • Much smaller than CP latch
    • Level sensitive
    • Thus, we need to convert two-phase control to four-phase
  • XOR acts as a two-phase to four-phase converter
  • Toggle acts as a four-phase to two-phase converter



22
Micropipeline 2-Phase PTnet including Latch Enable
  • Multiple instantiations of L signal (L/1, 2)


23
Micropipeline 2-Phase PTnet including Latch Enable and Single Latch Signal
  • Note the AC Return from Choice/Choice Needed
24
Two-phase Micropipeline Stage – with Double-Edge-Triggered FFs
  • Efficient Double-Edge-Triggered FFs can also be used
  • Buffer to FFs can be removed avoiding delay overhead


25
Delay Line Design

  • Symmetric
    • Designed with an even # of inverters that model worst-case path delay through combinational logic




  • Asymmetric
    • Faster reset implemented by replacing some INVs with NANDs




  • Other
    • May also use re-create path of gates along critical path to better match delay
26
Speculative Completion Sensing/Variable Latency
  • Enables data-dependent component delays in bundled-data environment


27
Micropipeline Pitfalls